AR: the directory by county and ZIP

61,086
practitioners: 29.7%
have a workplace: 20,917
provider organizations: 15,295
tax records (not added): 76
counties

Sort byHide counties under

The bar is the share with a workplace listed, not the number of practitioners. Ranking by headcount would just rank by population.

County	Practitioners	Has a workplace	Provider orgs	Tax records	ZIPs
+Pulaski County	16,428	37.3%	2,844	2,983	20
+Washington County	5,579	20.5%	1,071	1,118	11
+Craighead County	4,861	25.5%	748	732	10
+Benton County	3,860	35.2%	1,029	1,238	14
+Sebastian County	2,886	32.4%	931	786	10
+Faulkner County	2,758	14.2%	515	576	9
+Saline County	2,220	21.9%	418	458	9
+Garland County	2,032	40.4%	624	684	5
+Pope County	1,527	29.7%	288	311	7
+White County	1,284	21.4%	293	343	9
+Greene County	1,038	28.2%	195	197	2
+Independence County	904	26.2%	264	220	5
+Jefferson County	876	26.1%	332	416	6
+(county unknown)	805	15.5%	6,181	71	25
+Crittenden County	754	20.4%	272	280	3
+Baxter County	725	31.6%	292	324	6
+Miller County	638	13.6%	132	105	2
+Hot Spring County	584	33.0%	122	117	3
+Johnson County	575	22.8%	126	126	5
+Lonoke County	528	23.1%	171	218	7
+Boone County	521	30.7%	233	246	2
+Crawford County	514	8.6%	158	170	5
+Mississippi County	491	23.6%	209	192	5
+Clark County	426	12.7%	93	76	5
+Lawrence County	389	38.6%	66	67	4
+Poinsett County	384	29.7%	89	87	6
+Union County	381	26.8%	217	247	4
+Columbia County	369	50.1%	142	132	4
+St. Francis County	365	14.0%	112	111	3
+Ashley County	363	68.6%	92	109	4
+Drew County	342	12.3%	127	103	1
+Stone County	320	28.8%	59	51	2
+Howard County	290	20.7%	74	89	3
+Jackson County	287	33.4%	114	115	2
+Madison County	283	39.2%	21	18	1
+Cross County	268	20.5%	93	106	3
+Van Buren County	255	26.3%	49	43	4
+Conway County	240	20.0%	83	83	5
+Carroll County	239	41.4%	104	101	5
+Ouachita County	204	32.8%	104	87	3
+Logan County	184	41.3%	76	52	6
+Hempstead County	181	31.5%	93	79	1
+Cleburne County	179	40.2%	92	121	4
+Sharp County	173	30.6%	94	87	4
+Randolph County	169	24.3%	110	87	3
+Phillips County	164	32.9%	99	98	5
+Izard County	152	34.9%	59	50	6
+Arkansas County	144	28.5%	78	88	2
+Chicot County	139	15.1%	63	62	3
+Dallas County	131	30.5%	45	39	2
+Sevier County	131	37.4%	79	89	2
+Desha County	127	15.0%	64	51	2
+Polk County	124	32.3%	109	127	2
+Fulton County	124	62.9%	67	62	3
+Bradley County	117	41.0%	58	40	2
+Clay County	113	41.6%	71	73	4
+Grant County	112	17.9%	36	46	1
+Yell County	94	36.2%	63	62	5
+Scott County	90	66.7%	34	22	1
+Franklin County	87	41.4%	54	54	3
+Pike County	79	11.4%	47	46	4
+Woodruff County	73	43.8%	60	27	3
+Perry County	72	62.5%	13	16	2
+Monroe County	55	36.4%	41	32	2
+Little River County	45	33.3%	42	51	2
+Searcy County	41	29.3%	21	26	3
+Lee County	40	15.0%	24	14	1
+Nevada County	39	20.5%	28	28	1
+Marion County	27	55.6%	25	28	3
+Lincoln County	25	52.0%	22	31	2
+Prairie County	21	66.7%	19	21	2
+Cleveland County	13	38.5%	3	7	1
+Lafayette County	13	69.2%	22	28	3
+Newton County	10	40.0%	7	1	2
+Montgomery County	3	33.3%	8	7	2
+Calhoun County	2	0.0%	4	7	1

By profession, statewide

Profession	Practitioners	Has a workplace
behavioral-health	13,189	17.1%
other-clinical	10,682	2.3%
rehab-therapy	9,920	16.6%
physician	9,022	78.7%
advanced-practice	5,793	78.1%
pharmacy	2,826	8.1%
nursing	2,587	19.1%
student	1,988	6.7%
dental	1,541	15.6%
support	994	2.0%
chiropractic	656	55.3%
group	630	45.4%
eye-vision	526	74.7%
dietary	428	23.1%
podiatry	83	74.7%
facility	64	26.6%
agency	58	20.7%
no-taxonomy	36	8.3%
supplier	35	17.1%
emergency-medical	15	26.7%
transport	10	50.0%
payer	3	0.0%

Release 2026-08-20. Methodology 0.7.3-draft.

Counts come from the NDH bulk export at the release named above. Organizations are split by record type and never summed: roughly half the Organization file is `ein` tax records that carry an NPI and an address, so adding them to provider organizations roughly doubles the count. Practitioner geography uses the primary address; 14.85% of practitioners list addresses in more than one state and are counted only in the first. Counties are derived from the Census ZCTA-to-county relationship file, taking the county holding the largest share of a ZIP's population; ZIPs with no dominant county are grouped as unknown. Payer organizations carry no address at all and cannot appear in any geography. Profession categories here come from the directory's own Practitioner.qualification taxonomy, not from NPPES. H54 categorises the same practitioners against their NPPES taxonomy and lands 1 to 2 points different per profession as a result: PA physicians read 73.0% here and 74.3% there. Neither is wrong. This view describes what the directory says about itself, which is the right frame for a directory explorer; H54 asks how the directory compares to the federal registry.

Data as JSON: /api/v1/explorer/ar.json. Looking for one provider? Search by name or NPI.