Value explorer / IN
IN: the directory by county and ZIP
- 112,523
- practitioners
- 39.5%
- have a workplace
- 26,129
- provider organizations
- 1,102
- tax records (not added)
- 93
- counties
The bar is the share with a workplace listed, not the number of practitioners. Ranking by headcount would just rank by population.
| County | Practitioners | Has a workplace | Provider orgs | Tax records | ZIPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +Marion County | 29,528 | 30.1% | 4,945 | 155 | 37 |
| +Hamilton County | 9,180 | 47.6% | 1,751 | 62 | 13 |
| +Allen County | 7,960 | 46.8% | 1,582 | 64 | 24 |
| +Lake County | 7,214 | 43.8% | 2,574 | 89 | 25 |
| +St. Joseph County | 5,704 | 28.7% | 987 | 56 | 19 |
| +Hendricks County | 3,879 | 51.0% | 593 | 19 | 7 |
| +Vanderburgh County | 3,244 | 31.9% | 905 | 45 | 9 |
| +Johnson County | 3,100 | 45.5% | 647 | 28 | 8 |
| +Tippecanoe County | 2,925 | 28.7% | 565 | 36 | 8 |
| +Delaware County | 2,519 | 30.0% | 517 | 15 | 11 |
| +Monroe County | 2,272 | 29.4% | 517 | 20 | 8 |
| +Porter County | 2,110 | 35.9% | 583 | 31 | 6 |
| +Elkhart County | 1,942 | 44.4% | 577 | 33 | 11 |
| +Howard County | 1,938 | 24.2% | 396 | 13 | 4 |
| +Vigo County | 1,827 | 41.4% | 537 | 18 | 8 |
| +Clark County | 1,743 | 50.0% | 519 | 21 | 7 |
| +Madison County | 1,317 | 42.4% | 388 | 18 | 12 |
| +Bartholomew County | 1,287 | 31.5% | 308 | 12 | 3 |
| +Grant County | 1,261 | 21.8% | 244 | 9 | 7 |
| +Wayne County | 1,209 | 54.2% | 280 | 16 | 4 |
| +Floyd County | 1,055 | 39.3% | 381 | 17 | 3 |
| +LaPorte County | 951 | 53.8% | 376 | 15 | 7 |
| +Warrick County | 909 | 50.1% | 225 | 6 | 5 |
| +Boone County | 861 | 41.0% | 201 | 13 | 5 |
| +Hancock County | 790 | 51.6% | 226 | 12 | 6 |
| +Shelby County | 788 | 77.9% | 107 | 6 | 5 |
| +Knox County | 754 | 43.8% | 189 | 9 | 4 |
| +Kosciusko County | 746 | 35.9% | 178 | 8 | 10 |
| +Cass County | 701 | 48.8% | 123 | 10 | 5 |
| +Jefferson County | 648 | 70.2% | 101 | 3 | 2 |
| +Gibson County | 625 | 75.4% | 120 | 2 | 6 |
| +Henry County | 585 | 64.1% | 153 | 8 | 6 |
| +Morgan County | 581 | 55.9% | 180 | 8 | 4 |
| +Marshall County | 545 | 53.2% | 147 | 7 | 6 |
| +Dubois County | 530 | 37.2% | 217 | 6 | 5 |
| +Jackson County | 518 | 41.7% | 140 | 4 | 3 |
| +Wabash County | 498 | 65.7% | 103 | 10 | 4 |
| +Dearborn County | 422 | 47.4% | 111 | 9 | 5 |
| +Ripley County | 391 | 55.8% | 233 | 7 | 5 |
| +Lawrence County | 387 | 37.5% | 162 | 11 | 3 |
| +Harrison County | 359 | 67.7% | 114 | 2 | 8 |
| +Steuben County | 340 | 62.6% | 95 | 4 | 3 |
| +Daviess County | 325 | 42.2% | 166 | 1 | 4 |
| +Jasper County | 301 | 59.5% | 109 | 9 | 4 |
| +Montgomery County | 258 | 43.4% | 119 | 3 | 2 |
| +Putnam County | 255 | 47.1% | 97 | 3 | 6 |
| +Noble County | 241 | 28.2% | 65 | 2 | 5 |
| +Clinton County | 237 | 37.1% | 82 | 6 | 6 |
| +Adams County | 236 | 65.3% | 131 | 5 | 4 |
| +DeKalb County | 230 | 41.3% | 114 | 3 | 4 |
| +Starke County | 229 | 81.2% | 106 | 7 | 4 |
| +(county unknown) | 218 | 63.8% | 31 | 2 | 38 |
| +Greene County | 207 | 51.7% | 104 | 10 | 7 |
| +Wells County | 204 | 48.0% | 80 | 5 | 4 |
| +Miami County | 199 | 31.2% | 53 | 4 | 5 |
| +Rush County | 194 | 53.6% | 50 | 4 | 5 |
| +Huntington County | 190 | 42.1% | 79 | 5 | 3 |
| +Whitley County | 186 | 46.2% | 46 | 4 | 3 |
| +Scott County | 173 | 57.2% | 87 | 5 | 3 |
| +Decatur County | 162 | 19.1% | 73 | 6 | 1 |
| +Perry County | 155 | 54.2% | 84 | 4 | 5 |
| +Clay County | 150 | 46.0% | 53 | 4 | 3 |
| +Tipton County | 134 | 74.6% | 61 | 5 | 2 |
| +Fulton County | 130 | 60.0% | 57 | 4 | 2 |
| +Fayette County | 124 | 37.9% | 107 | 4 | 1 |
| +Washington County | 117 | 41.0% | 73 | 1 | 4 |
| +LaGrange County | 112 | 49.1% | 61 | 5 | 4 |
| +Jennings County | 111 | 41.4% | 46 | 4 | 3 |
| +White County | 103 | 26.2% | 53 | 1 | 4 |
| +Franklin County | 101 | 72.3% | 34 | 2 | 2 |
| +Carroll County | 91 | 49.5% | 24 | 1 | 4 |
| +Randolph County | 90 | 22.2% | 52 | 7 | 7 |
| +Spencer County | 80 | 48.8% | 49 | 2 | 8 |
| +Jay County | 79 | 38.0% | 59 | 5 | 4 |
| +Sullivan County | 79 | 48.1% | 42 | 5 | 5 |
| +Brown County | 78 | 67.9% | 31 | 0 | 2 |
| +Orange County | 64 | 17.2% | 44 | 2 | 4 |
| +Vermillion County | 62 | 17.7% | 29 | 1 | 2 |
| +Posey County | 58 | 29.3% | 20 | 2 | 5 |
| +Fountain County | 56 | 25.0% | 26 | 2 | 3 |
| +Switzerland County | 53 | 50.9% | 21 | 2 | 1 |
| +Martin County | 52 | 46.2% | 24 | 2 | 3 |
| +Pulaski County | 42 | 35.7% | 34 | 2 | 3 |
| +Blackford County | 36 | 36.1% | 21 | 2 | 2 |
| +Pike County | 35 | 54.3% | 25 | 1 | 2 |
| +Parke County | 35 | 57.1% | 35 | 4 | 3 |
| +Owen County | 31 | 25.8% | 19 | 2 | 2 |
| +Crawford County | 21 | 14.3% | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| +Warren County | 19 | 52.6% | 10 | 0 | 2 |
| +Ohio County | 16 | 6.2% | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| +Newton County | 9 | 11.1% | 9 | 1 | 4 |
| +Union County | 7 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 2 |
| +Benton County | 5 | 20.0% | 13 | 2 | 4 |
By profession, statewide
| Profession | Practitioners | Has a workplace |
|---|---|---|
| behavioral-health | 37,777 | 20.5% |
| physician | 21,062 | 77.3% |
| rehab-therapy | 14,246 | 24.9% |
| advanced-practice | 13,373 | 77.5% |
| pharmacy | 5,632 | 4.7% |
| nursing | 4,325 | 40.5% |
| dental | 4,283 | 17.3% |
| student | 3,357 | 9.6% |
| other-clinical | 2,135 | 22.3% |
| eye-vision | 1,581 | 65.5% |
| chiropractic | 1,418 | 52.3% |
| dietary | 954 | 19.0% |
| group | 688 | 61.9% |
| support | 571 | 17.0% |
| podiatry | 421 | 74.6% |
| no-taxonomy | 233 | 14.2% |
| facility | 146 | 16.4% |
| agency | 142 | 49.3% |
| supplier | 91 | 16.5% |
| emergency-medical | 70 | 28.6% |
| transport | 18 | 27.8% |
Release 2026-10-07. Methodology 0.7.3-draft.
Counts come from the NDH bulk export at the release named above. Organizations are split by record type and never summed: roughly half the Organization file is `ein` tax records that carry an NPI and an address, so adding them to provider organizations roughly doubles the count. Practitioner geography uses the primary address; 14.85% of practitioners list addresses in more than one state and are counted only in the first. Counties are derived from the Census ZCTA-to-county relationship file, taking the county holding the largest share of a ZIP's population; ZIPs with no dominant county are grouped as unknown. Payer organizations carry no address at all and cannot appear in any geography. Profession categories here come from the directory's own Practitioner.qualification taxonomy, not from NPPES. H54 categorises the same practitioners against their NPPES taxonomy and lands 1 to 2 points different per profession as a result: PA physicians read 73.0% here and 74.3% there. Neither is wrong. This view describes what the directory says about itself, which is the right frame for a directory explorer; H54 asks how the directory compares to the federal registry.
Data as JSON: /api/v1/explorer/in.json. Looking for one provider? Search by name or NPI.