Value explorer / KS
KS: the directory by county and ZIP
- 49,290
- practitioners
- 38.0%
- have a workplace
- 13,803
- provider organizations
- 890
- tax records (not added)
- 106
- counties
The bar is the share with a workplace listed, not the number of practitioners. Ranking by headcount would just rank by population.
| County | Practitioners | Has a workplace | Provider orgs | Tax records | ZIPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +Johnson County | 14,109 | 45.3% | 3,355 | 151 | 32 |
| +Sedgwick County | 9,688 | 31.9% | 2,539 | 112 | 35 |
| +Shawnee County | 4,446 | 29.0% | 774 | 30 | 22 |
| +Leavenworth County | 2,179 | 17.8% | 271 | 11 | 6 |
| +Douglas County | 2,048 | 32.6% | 474 | 25 | 7 |
| +(county unknown) | 1,615 | 27.9% | 38 | 3 | 21 |
| +Riley County | 1,325 | 36.4% | 321 | 17 | 5 |
| +Wyandotte County | 1,193 | 28.4% | 420 | 13 | 11 |
| +Saline County | 914 | 35.1% | 281 | 24 | 3 |
| +Reno County | 764 | 43.1% | 353 | 19 | 8 |
| +Geary County | 744 | 41.3% | 102 | 7 | 2 |
| +Crawford County | 669 | 51.1% | 232 | 17 | 5 |
| +Butler County | 649 | 47.8% | 204 | 12 | 7 |
| +Ellis County | 624 | 39.9% | 212 | 15 | 2 |
| +Harvey County | 544 | 35.7% | 166 | 14 | 5 |
| +Lyon County | 513 | 39.6% | 147 | 8 | 1 |
| +McPherson County | 456 | 52.6% | 141 | 21 | 5 |
| +Finney County | 382 | 41.4% | 162 | 10 | 2 |
| +Ford County | 379 | 56.5% | 168 | 10 | 2 |
| +Barton County | 347 | 40.3% | 209 | 17 | 4 |
| +Montgomery County | 335 | 26.9% | 169 | 15 | 4 |
| +Franklin County | 321 | 50.8% | 93 | 10 | 4 |
| +Cowley County | 321 | 53.9% | 162 | 12 | 4 |
| +Miami County | 268 | 32.8% | 107 | 6 | 4 |
| +Cherokee County | 235 | 56.6% | 90 | 7 | 4 |
| +Russell County | 234 | 16.2% | 22 | 3 | 1 |
| +Labette County | 204 | 38.7% | 119 | 6 | 4 |
| +Allen County | 195 | 39.5% | 65 | 5 | 3 |
| +Thomas County | 193 | 69.4% | 88 | 4 | 2 |
| +Brown County | 177 | 41.2% | 79 | 8 | 3 |
| +Atchison County | 151 | 26.5% | 63 | 5 | 2 |
| +Dickinson County | 145 | 60.0% | 89 | 13 | 5 |
| +Jackson County | 140 | 57.1% | 59 | 5 | 4 |
| +Seward County | 138 | 36.2% | 96 | 4 | 1 |
| +Neosho County | 134 | 26.9% | 81 | 4 | 3 |
| +Marion County | 108 | 54.6% | 70 | 6 | 6 |
| +Pratt County | 105 | 52.4% | 56 | 3 | 1 |
| +Greenwood County | 100 | 80.0% | 49 | 7 | 1 |
| +Bourbon County | 98 | 34.7% | 68 | 4 | 3 |
| +Linn County | 96 | 90.6% | 22 | 1 | 5 |
| +Cloud County | 93 | 55.9% | 44 | 6 | 4 |
| +Sumner County | 89 | 33.7% | 63 | 7 | 8 |
| +Nemaha County | 73 | 64.4% | 55 | 12 | 6 |
| +Pawnee County | 73 | 24.7% | 34 | 5 | 2 |
| +Norton County | 73 | 50.7% | 47 | 4 | 1 |
| +Sherman County | 69 | 55.1% | 49 | 3 | 1 |
| +Rice County | 67 | 44.8% | 47 | 7 | 4 |
| +Marshall County | 65 | 67.7% | 55 | 10 | 7 |
| +Scott County | 65 | 52.3% | 19 | 0 | 1 |
| +Lincoln County | 62 | 45.2% | 25 | 3 | 2 |
| +Wilson County | 59 | 49.2% | 55 | 7 | 2 |
| +Republic County | 59 | 40.7% | 29 | 4 | 2 |
| +Ellsworth County | 55 | 40.0% | 26 | 3 | 4 |
| +Phillips County | 55 | 43.6% | 30 | 4 | 3 |
| +Pottawatomie County | 51 | 43.1% | 53 | 4 | 5 |
| +Harper County | 50 | 58.0% | 46 | 5 | 3 |
| +Barber County | 50 | 70.0% | 36 | 4 | 2 |
| +Grant County | 48 | 58.3% | 35 | 2 | 1 |
| +Kingman County | 45 | 48.9% | 29 | 3 | 3 |
| +Anderson County | 44 | 25.0% | 59 | 2 | 3 |
| +Clay County | 43 | 25.6% | 40 | 6 | 2 |
| +Mitchell County | 42 | 54.8% | 33 | 5 | 1 |
| +Stevens County | 39 | 71.8% | 22 | 7 | 1 |
| +Osage County | 38 | 42.1% | 23 | 4 | 7 |
| +Logan County | 38 | 65.8% | 23 | 5 | 1 |
| +Coffey County | 35 | 17.1% | 27 | 3 | 2 |
| +Jewell County | 34 | 52.9% | 19 | 5 | 3 |
| +Cheyenne County | 27 | 37.0% | 13 | 3 | 2 |
| +Decatur County | 26 | 42.3% | 20 | 2 | 1 |
| +Osborne County | 25 | 28.0% | 23 | 6 | 3 |
| +Doniphan County | 24 | 41.7% | 21 | 2 | 5 |
| +Jefferson County | 23 | 39.1% | 43 | 6 | 8 |
| +Smith County | 23 | 52.2% | 36 | 4 | 2 |
| +Woodson County | 22 | 59.1% | 22 | 1 | 1 |
| +Kiowa County | 22 | 40.9% | 18 | 3 | 2 |
| +Rooks County | 22 | 40.9% | 30 | 5 | 3 |
| +Kearny County | 20 | 70.0% | 22 | 2 | 2 |
| +Ness County | 19 | 63.2% | 27 | 4 | 2 |
| +Washington County | 18 | 50.0% | 23 | 6 | 5 |
| +Clark County | 18 | 72.2% | 13 | 3 | 2 |
| +Ottawa County | 17 | 52.9% | 17 | 3 | 3 |
| +Morris County | 16 | 31.2% | 23 | 4 | 1 |
| +Rawlins County | 16 | 37.5% | 12 | 3 | 1 |
| +Haskell County | 15 | 33.3% | 13 | 2 | 2 |
| +Graham County | 14 | 57.1% | 16 | 3 | 1 |
| +Wichita County | 14 | 50.0% | 10 | 3 | 1 |
| +Chautauqua County | 12 | 16.7% | 15 | 3 | 1 |
| +Gove County | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| +Chase County | 11 | 63.6% | 8 | 1 | 1 |
| +Edwards County | 10 | 50.0% | 13 | 2 | 1 |
| +Greeley County | 10 | 100.0% | 9 | 2 | 1 |
| +Trego County | 8 | 25.0% | 16 | 4 | 1 |
| +Stafford County | 7 | 28.6% | 15 | 3 | 3 |
| +Sheridan County | 7 | 71.4% | 10 | 2 | 2 |
| +Comanche County | 5 | 100.0% | 6 | 1 | 2 |
| +Wallace County | 5 | 60.0% | 9 | 1 | 2 |
| +Gray County | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| +Morton County | 4 | 75.0% | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| +Elk County | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| +Rush County | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 1 | 1 |
| +Lane County | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| +Hodgeman County | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 1 | 2 |
| +Hamilton County | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| +Stanton County | 1 | 100.0% | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| +Wabaunsee County | 0 | — | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| +Meade County | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By profession, statewide
| Profession | Practitioners | Has a workplace |
|---|---|---|
| behavioral-health | 13,346 | 20.3% |
| physician | 9,349 | 69.5% |
| rehab-therapy | 6,923 | 22.8% |
| advanced-practice | 6,618 | 72.6% |
| nursing | 2,774 | 27.8% |
| pharmacy | 2,636 | 7.7% |
| dental | 1,958 | 15.8% |
| other-clinical | 1,526 | 8.6% |
| chiropractic | 1,466 | 45.3% |
| eye-vision | 771 | 66.5% |
| student | 644 | 11.8% |
| dietary | 445 | 22.9% |
| group | 373 | 63.5% |
| support | 133 | 9.8% |
| podiatry | 112 | 67.0% |
| no-taxonomy | 82 | 24.4% |
| facility | 54 | 18.5% |
| agency | 25 | 40.0% |
| supplier | 22 | 13.6% |
| emergency-medical | 20 | 35.0% |
| transport | 10 | 0.0% |
| payer | 3 | 0.0% |
Release 2026-10-07. Methodology 0.7.3-draft.
Counts come from the NDH bulk export at the release named above. Organizations are split by record type and never summed: roughly half the Organization file is `ein` tax records that carry an NPI and an address, so adding them to provider organizations roughly doubles the count. Practitioner geography uses the primary address; 14.85% of practitioners list addresses in more than one state and are counted only in the first. Counties are derived from the Census ZCTA-to-county relationship file, taking the county holding the largest share of a ZIP's population; ZIPs with no dominant county are grouped as unknown. Payer organizations carry no address at all and cannot appear in any geography. Profession categories here come from the directory's own Practitioner.qualification taxonomy, not from NPPES. H54 categorises the same practitioners against their NPPES taxonomy and lands 1 to 2 points different per profession as a result: PA physicians read 73.0% here and 74.3% there. Neither is wrong. This view describes what the directory says about itself, which is the right frame for a directory explorer; H54 asks how the directory compares to the federal registry.
Data as JSON: /api/v1/explorer/ks.json. Looking for one provider? Search by name or NPI.