Value explorer / MN
MN: the directory by county and ZIP
- 125,598
- practitioners
- 46.2%
- have a workplace
- 29,820
- provider organizations
- 1,181
- tax records (not added)
- 88
- counties
The bar is the share with a workplace listed, not the number of practitioners. Ranking by headcount would just rank by population.
| County | Practitioners | Has a workplace | Provider orgs | Tax records | ZIPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +Hennepin County | 42,749 | 42.8% | 13,094 | 391 | 66 |
| +Ramsey County | 14,199 | 43.9% | 3,502 | 117 | 20 |
| +Olmsted County | 11,078 | 58.4% | 568 | 19 | 8 |
| +Dakota County | 10,825 | 47.4% | 1,894 | 56 | 16 |
| +Stearns County | 5,637 | 35.1% | 792 | 39 | 20 |
| +St. Louis County | 4,971 | 47.1% | 903 | 47 | 27 |
| +Anoka County | 4,753 | 44.2% | 976 | 29 | 12 |
| +Washington County | 4,117 | 40.9% | 864 | 35 | 16 |
| +Blue Earth County | 3,108 | 68.1% | 285 | 15 | 5 |
| +Carver County | 1,534 | 59.3% | 404 | 20 | 10 |
| +Wright County | 1,297 | 52.9% | 300 | 14 | 14 |
| +Crow Wing County | 1,216 | 42.4% | 299 | 19 | 10 |
| +Scott County | 1,133 | 45.3% | 352 | 11 | 8 |
| +Clay County | 1,021 | 24.8% | 197 | 12 | 7 |
| +Mower County | 977 | 67.5% | 112 | 11 | 5 |
| +Kandiyohi County | 903 | 51.5% | 194 | 11 | 5 |
| +Rice County | 889 | 45.2% | 261 | 8 | 4 |
| +Becker County | 854 | 56.1% | 142 | 10 | 6 |
| +Sherburne County | 841 | 55.6% | 191 | 11 | 5 |
| +Otter Tail County | 820 | 36.1% | 175 | 15 | 10 |
| +Itasca County | 796 | 64.9% | 178 | 14 | 6 |
| +Douglas County | 741 | 50.6% | 184 | 8 | 7 |
| +Beltrami County | 730 | 45.6% | 210 | 11 | 4 |
| +Winona County | 679 | 51.5% | 148 | 5 | 3 |
| +McLeod County | 614 | 48.0% | 127 | 3 | 6 |
| +Steele County | 432 | 39.8% | 183 | 6 | 5 |
| +Goodhue County | 428 | 49.1% | 143 | 9 | 9 |
| +Nicollet County | 428 | 27.1% | 71 | 9 | 3 |
| +Lyon County | 385 | 41.8% | 124 | 5 | 6 |
| +Brown County | 384 | 48.4% | 117 | 8 | 4 |
| +Isanti County | 367 | 24.5% | 87 | 4 | 3 |
| +Nobles County | 335 | 73.1% | 104 | 7 | 4 |
| +Carlton County | 313 | 46.0% | 106 | 9 | 7 |
| +Mille Lacs County | 305 | 34.4% | 111 | 5 | 5 |
| +Chisago County | 293 | 29.4% | 124 | 6 | 9 |
| +Pine County | 267 | 52.1% | 94 | 4 | 8 |
| +Polk County | 240 | 42.9% | 107 | 8 | 7 |
| +Freeborn County | 229 | 37.6% | 65 | 5 | 4 |
| +Redwood County | 227 | 77.1% | 49 | 7 | 6 |
| +Wadena County | 214 | 41.6% | 63 | 4 | 4 |
| +Renville County | 204 | 77.9% | 53 | 3 | 7 |
| +Wabasha County | 202 | 53.5% | 65 | 7 | 6 |
| +Morrison County | 198 | 48.5% | 94 | 4 | 5 |
| +Pennington County | 192 | 53.1% | 68 | 1 | 1 |
| +Hubbard County | 178 | 43.3% | 77 | 5 | 3 |
| +Pope County | 172 | 84.3% | 37 | 2 | 3 |
| +Koochiching County | 160 | 68.1% | 63 | 5 | 5 |
| +Martin County | 150 | 32.7% | 64 | 3 | 4 |
| +Kanabec County | 145 | 41.4% | 45 | 3 | 3 |
| +Cass County | 144 | 13.2% | 63 | 4 | 9 |
| +Benton County | 138 | 47.8% | 88 | 5 | 3 |
| +Aitkin County | 137 | 63.5% | 46 | 3 | 4 |
| +Todd County | 130 | 46.9% | 68 | 6 | 5 |
| +Chippewa County | 128 | 36.7% | 43 | 4 | 3 |
| +Pipestone County | 124 | 47.6% | 44 | 8 | 4 |
| +Watonwan County | 122 | 66.4% | 46 | 6 | 2 |
| +Stevens County | 109 | 41.3% | 60 | 2 | 2 |
| +Houston County | 106 | 57.5% | 50 | 4 | 4 |
| +Meeker County | 105 | 22.9% | 51 | 6 | 5 |
| +Lake County | 92 | 22.8% | 38 | 3 | 2 |
| +(county unknown) | 91 | 22.0% | 18 | 1 | 22 |
| +Rock County | 84 | 53.6% | 26 | 2 | 2 |
| +Waseca County | 81 | 48.1% | 41 | 1 | 3 |
| +Wilkin County | 81 | 34.6% | 33 | 3 | 4 |
| +Kittson County | 80 | 91.2% | 21 | 4 | 4 |
| +Grant County | 70 | 82.9% | 18 | 1 | 5 |
| +Clearwater County | 69 | 65.2% | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| +Lac qui Parle County | 65 | 69.2% | 27 | 3 | 3 |
| +Roseau County | 61 | 42.6% | 41 | 3 | 3 |
| +Big Stone County | 58 | 13.8% | 23 | 3 | 2 |
| +Faribault County | 56 | 37.5% | 29 | 3 | 4 |
| +Cottonwood County | 54 | 25.9% | 43 | 5 | 4 |
| +Fillmore County | 51 | 62.7% | 53 | 6 | 8 |
| +Yellow Medicine County | 46 | 41.3% | 38 | 3 | 5 |
| +Swift County | 42 | 42.9% | 32 | 4 | 3 |
| +Le Sueur County | 41 | 36.6% | 53 | 5 | 5 |
| +Murray County | 41 | 29.3% | 23 | 4 | 3 |
| +Norman County | 40 | 47.5% | 20 | 1 | 3 |
| +Dodge County | 37 | 24.3% | 27 | 3 | 6 |
| +Jackson County | 34 | 47.1% | 37 | 3 | 4 |
| +Mahnomen County | 34 | 44.1% | 8 | 1 | 1 |
| +Sibley County | 31 | 19.4% | 33 | 1 | 6 |
| +Cook County | 24 | 33.3% | 15 | 2 | 2 |
| +Traverse County | 21 | 23.8% | 19 | 3 | 2 |
| +Marshall County | 17 | 47.1% | 19 | 3 | 2 |
| +Lake of the Woods County | 10 | 30.0% | 10 | 1 | 1 |
| +Lincoln County | 7 | 85.7% | 11 | 1 | 3 |
| +Red Lake County | 7 | 71.4% | 14 | 0 | 2 |
By profession, statewide
| Profession | Practitioners | Has a workplace |
|---|---|---|
| behavioral-health | 39,543 | 35.6% |
| physician | 25,439 | 77.4% |
| advanced-practice | 16,061 | 75.8% |
| rehab-therapy | 15,617 | 33.1% |
| nursing | 5,801 | 19.8% |
| pharmacy | 5,222 | 8.1% |
| dental | 4,707 | 17.4% |
| chiropractic | 3,213 | 48.7% |
| other-clinical | 2,712 | 20.4% |
| student | 1,832 | 10.4% |
| dietary | 1,491 | 38.4% |
| eye-vision | 1,260 | 68.2% |
| support | 832 | 7.7% |
| group | 663 | 60.6% |
| no-taxonomy | 538 | 11.2% |
| podiatry | 260 | 79.2% |
| agency | 169 | 30.8% |
| facility | 112 | 23.2% |
| transport | 49 | 30.6% |
| supplier | 45 | 13.3% |
| emergency-medical | 25 | 36.0% |
| payer | 7 | 0.0% |
Release 2026-10-07. Methodology 0.7.3-draft.
Counts come from the NDH bulk export at the release named above. Organizations are split by record type and never summed: roughly half the Organization file is `ein` tax records that carry an NPI and an address, so adding them to provider organizations roughly doubles the count. Practitioner geography uses the primary address; 14.85% of practitioners list addresses in more than one state and are counted only in the first. Counties are derived from the Census ZCTA-to-county relationship file, taking the county holding the largest share of a ZIP's population; ZIPs with no dominant county are grouped as unknown. Payer organizations carry no address at all and cannot appear in any geography. Profession categories here come from the directory's own Practitioner.qualification taxonomy, not from NPPES. H54 categorises the same practitioners against their NPPES taxonomy and lands 1 to 2 points different per profession as a result: PA physicians read 73.0% here and 74.3% there. Neither is wrong. This view describes what the directory says about itself, which is the right frame for a directory explorer; H54 asks how the directory compares to the federal registry.
Data as JSON: /api/v1/explorer/mn.json. Looking for one provider? Search by name or NPI.