Value explorer / SD
SD: the directory by county and ZIP
- 15,706
- practitioners
- 42.8%
- have a workplace
- 4,377
- provider organizations
- 242
- tax records (not added)
- 62
- counties
The bar is the share with a workplace listed, not the number of practitioners. Ranking by headcount would just rank by population.
| County | Practitioners | Has a workplace | Provider orgs | Tax records | ZIPs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +Minnehaha County | 6,195 | 41.6% | 1,095 | 37 | 15 |
| +Pennington County | 2,678 | 42.8% | 712 | 32 | 7 |
| +Lincoln County | 812 | 46.7% | 421 | 13 | 6 |
| +Meade County | 718 | 9.7% | 71 | 9 | 6 |
| +Brown County | 557 | 40.4% | 192 | 6 | 3 |
| +Yankton County | 535 | 43.4% | 136 | 6 | 2 |
| +Lawrence County | 464 | 60.8% | 158 | 6 | 5 |
| +Codington County | 461 | 35.6% | 159 | 10 | 2 |
| +Davison County | 348 | 46.6% | 150 | 8 | 1 |
| +Union County | 318 | 52.5% | 102 | 6 | 4 |
| +Brookings County | 294 | 54.4% | 116 | 6 | 3 |
| +Hughes County | 248 | 52.8% | 118 | 11 | 1 |
| +Beadle County | 234 | 47.9% | 80 | 9 | 2 |
| +Clay County | 229 | 60.7% | 60 | 5 | 2 |
| +Fall River County | 195 | 27.2% | 47 | 4 | 2 |
| +Roberts County | 194 | 47.9% | 34 | 3 | 4 |
| +Grant County | 120 | 44.2% | 36 | 3 | 3 |
| +Lake County | 87 | 33.3% | 31 | 2 | 4 |
| +Charles Mix County | 83 | 42.2% | 21 | 2 | 3 |
| +Hand County | 83 | 74.7% | 20 | 2 | 1 |
| +Custer County | 79 | 59.5% | 47 | 2 | 1 |
| +Brule County | 74 | 55.4% | 43 | 1 | 2 |
| +Tripp County | 63 | 23.8% | 34 | 4 | 2 |
| +Walworth County | 55 | 63.6% | 31 | 2 | 3 |
| +Day County | 51 | 82.4% | 27 | 3 | 2 |
| +Spink County | 50 | 68.0% | 32 | 3 | 4 |
| +Butte County | 48 | 47.9% | 51 | 7 | 2 |
| +Bennett County | 47 | 91.5% | 13 | 1 | 1 |
| +Hutchinson County | 40 | 52.5% | 44 | 3 | 4 |
| +(county unknown) | 32 | 6.2% | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| +Gregory County | 29 | 62.1% | 25 | 4 | 3 |
| +Bon Homme County | 26 | 42.3% | 19 | 3 | 3 |
| +Moody County | 24 | 20.8% | 27 | 3 | 2 |
| +Jerauld County | 21 | 71.4% | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| +Dewey County | 18 | 16.7% | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| +Kingsbury County | 17 | 23.5% | 18 | 1 | 4 |
| +Marshall County | 14 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 2 |
| +Lyman County | 14 | 71.4% | 11 | 1 | 2 |
| +Potter County | 13 | 38.5% | 14 | 2 | 1 |
| +Mellette County | 13 | 92.3% | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| +Perkins County | 13 | 38.5% | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| +Clark County | 11 | 36.4% | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| +Deuel County | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| +Douglas County | 11 | 54.5% | 19 | 1 | 2 |
| +McPherson County | 10 | 60.0% | 13 | 2 | 3 |
| +Edmunds County | 10 | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| +Aurora County | 9 | 77.8% | 11 | 1 | 3 |
| +McCook County | 8 | 0.0% | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| +Haakon County | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 1 | 1 |
| +Faulk County | 7 | 14.3% | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| +Turner County | 6 | 0.0% | 9 | 2 | 3 |
| +Hyde County | 5 | 100.0% | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| +Stanley County | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 2 | 1 |
| +Hamlin County | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| +Hanson County | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| +Campbell County | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| +Sanborn County | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| +Miner County | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| +Jones County | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| +Corson County | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| +Harding County | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| +Ziebach County | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By profession, statewide
| Profession | Practitioners | Has a workplace |
|---|---|---|
| behavioral-health | 3,283 | 31.1% |
| physician | 2,676 | 75.4% |
| advanced-practice | 2,631 | 77.2% |
| rehab-therapy | 2,523 | 25.4% |
| nursing | 1,141 | 13.1% |
| pharmacy | 904 | 4.6% |
| dental | 602 | 14.6% |
| chiropractic | 490 | 58.0% |
| other-clinical | 338 | 27.2% |
| eye-vision | 272 | 68.0% |
| student | 250 | 10.0% |
| dietary | 217 | 18.9% |
| support | 189 | 4.8% |
| group | 90 | 53.3% |
| podiatry | 39 | 74.4% |
| no-taxonomy | 21 | 23.8% |
| facility | 18 | 27.8% |
| emergency-medical | 7 | 28.6% |
| agency | 6 | 16.7% |
| supplier | 5 | 40.0% |
| transport | 3 | 0.0% |
| payer | 1 | 0.0% |
Release 2026-10-07. Methodology 0.7.3-draft.
Counts come from the NDH bulk export at the release named above. Organizations are split by record type and never summed: roughly half the Organization file is `ein` tax records that carry an NPI and an address, so adding them to provider organizations roughly doubles the count. Practitioner geography uses the primary address; 14.85% of practitioners list addresses in more than one state and are counted only in the first. Counties are derived from the Census ZCTA-to-county relationship file, taking the county holding the largest share of a ZIP's population; ZIPs with no dominant county are grouped as unknown. Payer organizations carry no address at all and cannot appear in any geography. Profession categories here come from the directory's own Practitioner.qualification taxonomy, not from NPPES. H54 categorises the same practitioners against their NPPES taxonomy and lands 1 to 2 points different per profession as a result: PA physicians read 73.0% here and 74.3% there. Neither is wrong. This view describes what the directory says about itself, which is the right frame for a directory explorer; H54 asks how the directory compares to the federal registry.
Data as JSON: /api/v1/explorer/sd.json. Looking for one provider? Search by name or NPI.